Last month, I had the privilege to present at
Interface B in Tan-Tar-A over my successes and failures of implementing Project
Based Learning in my classroom this year. My presentation focused on the overall concepts of PBL according to the
Buck Institute of Education as well as the structure and results of the PBL
unit I created while at PBL World last summer.
|
|
|
First,
interest in PBL is very high. I could
tell by the amount of teachers signed up for my sessions. It makes sense as a Science teacher due to
the structure of the Next Generation Science Standards, which are very heavy
in standards that require students to do and create rather than memorize and
recite. In some of my conversations, I
found that many of the educators are looking for ways to make their lessons
more relevant to the students and more authentic. PBL structure allows for much more
authentic learning than stand and deliver.
Second,
concerns about PBL implementation from the educators I spoke with are not
that dissimilar to those I have heard at our district. How do you accurately assess the students
in a group project? Just how much choice do I give the students in their
products? How much scaffolding do I
provide? These are all concerns I
addressed at the conference. I was
very impressed with the focused questions I got from them and were able to
address effectively.
Overall, I
was very excited to share my knowledge with other educators and get great
feedback from them on my unit as well. I was very impressed with the amount
of participation I received from other educators and would continue to
provide these workshops. I have provided the PowerPoint presentation
and packet
if anyone would like to take a look at it.
|
March 23, 2016
Implementing PBL in the Science Classroom
Categories:
Interface Conference,
PBL,
Tony Atkins
